As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The statement asserts that things become more understandable, complex, and mysterious as we acquire more knowledge. While this statement would hold for most instances, it fails to recognize that some facts can be difficult and perplexing, depending on our understanding. For example, the information is accurate of the atomic structure of the atom, which certainly seems complex and mysterious since humans have no way of perceiving the atom as a whole, but only as a collection of discrete parts. However, the statement is false of basic biological structures, such as the cell, which have been studied extensively and show a remarkable level of comprehensibility.

However, while it is true that the understanding of specific facts can shift, there are certainly some facts that become more understandable as our knowledge increases. For example, the idea that the earth revolves around the sun seems simple since the planet and the sun orbit a common center. But this idea becomes more complex and mysterious when we come to discover that the sun is about 1,000 times larger than the earth and that its orbit around the world is elliptical. This knowledge is explained by the theory of the heliocentric model, which states that the earth and the sun are stationary bodies orbiting a common center, rather than the earth being the center of the universe. When viewed from this perspective, the world seems a simple motionless body when it is orbiting the sun, which is much, much farther away than the earth.

When we look at reality, we know that our knowledge expands as we acquire more information, but we cannot comprehend all that we currently know. Our faculties limit our knowledge and understanding. The mind can only grasp so much information at one time, and different individuals have different levels of understanding. For example, if we look at a glass of water, we can understand how the water is structured because the water has an orderly structure. However, if we try to understand how water is arranged within molecules, our knowledge becomes more complex because we cannot understand the individual pieces of water.

This knowledge is complex. However, the complexity is not due to extra parts but to the ability of the human mind to comprehend only certain levels of information. While it is possible to go into greater detail, there would be no way to understand that level of detail. With the discovery of nuclear fusion, the atomic structure of the atom has been resolved to an incredible level of detail. However, it takes a mind equipped with special instruments to comprehend the nuclear structure. Therefore, the complexity is not due to the addition of parts but to the limitation of our ability to understand certain levels of information.

To sum up, the statement is not entirely accurate. While it is generally true that as our knowledge expands, certain aspects of reality become less comprehensible, this statement fails to recognize the relativity of comprehensibility. For instance, some facts, such as the structure of the atom, are more understandable as our knowledge increases, and others, such as biological structures, become more complex and mysterious.

Total
0
Shares
Total
0
Share