This thought-provoking statement challenges the notion that the means used to attain a goal are always justified by that goal. It is a logical question because the general public has a natural inclination to believe that they do not need to explain their actions as long as they achieve their goals. However, this statement implicitly suggests that the actions of any individual or group who deviate from this goal may be viewed as corrupt or immoral.

This statement is debatable because the means used to reach a goal are often in direct opposition to that goal. For instance, one may be pursuing the goal of leading a wholesome life but resort to cheating or stealing to attain that goal. However, this does not necessarily mean that the individual in question has violated their goal. These actions may only be deemed immoral if the individual in question intends to benefit themselves directly. For example, a dishonest person could steal food or other sustenance to feed themselves and their families. An individual pursuing the goal of being rich may cheat on a test to boost their grade, but this act may not violate their goal.

Furthermore, it does not necessarily follow that any means used to attain a goal is morally justified. For example, the means currently used by terrorists to achieve their ends are heinous, but in most people’s opinion, they are not immoral. If terrorists are motivated by a sincere belief in their cause, calling their actions corrupt becomes more difficult.

In the same way, the statement can equally be applied to the pursuit of wealth. While a person may have the goal of becoming rich, they may exploit others to achieve their goals. For example, a corporation may manipulate its employees to achieve greater profits. While the employees may technically be motivated by becoming wealthy, they are exploited by their employers. One would not say that the actions of these employees were immoral because the goal of acquiring wealth was achieved.

The statement also implies that the pursuit of wealth is, in itself, an immoral goal. This is a debatable statement. While pursuing wealth may be immoral, it is not necessarily harmful to work toward that goal. For example, a student may pursue a high-paying career that will allow them to live comfortably upon graduation while simultaneously pursuing finance-related degrees so that they can increase their wealth. In such a situation, the means used to achieve these goals may be immoral, but the purpose of wealth is not.

The statement also implies that the pursuit of fame or power is never justified because the quest for fame and management is often based on deceit. Many people go to great lengths to lie, steal, and manipulate others to attain fame or power. However, this does not necessarily mean that their actions were immoral. For example, an actor may perform in pornographic films to advance his career. While acting in these films can be considered immoral, the actor may genuinely believe that working in these films will help him achieve his goal of achieving fame or power. Furthermore, acting in a pornographic movie is often the only way an actor can achieve fame or power, so he may believe it is his best option.

In conclusion, the statement can be interpreted to mean that the pursuit of any worthy goal may be justified, but the pursuit of an immoral goal is not. Whether a particular action is considered immoral depends on its purpose and whether or not the individual believes that this goal is worthwhile.